YuYuen:

CP003:

Hortford:

我覺得,很多事都需要證明,但有一些已無法證明.

像之前Bryant在少了O'Neal之後,拿到得兩個冠軍,舉例,講第一次,如果那時湖人沒有''搶''到大Gasol,只憑當時技術不純熟的中鋒Andrew Bynum當「單塔」, 能打敗魔術,拿到那次冠軍? Phil Jackson少了證明自己的機會.

相反的,來看Popovich,現在Popovich...嗯,沒人知道他能當馬刺教練多久?Duncan不久後會退休,Ginobili也可能引退.變成只有Tony Parker一個「巨頭」,那時候,由他跟現在的Splitter, Leonard 和Danny Green等人搭配,馬刺還能拿50勝?

Popovich真能撐到那時候,還得看馬刺高層另外找來的人,他使用的能力如何?結果不良的話,可能還會戰績不佳,去抽樂透選秀籤呢!

講白一點,少了Duncan這個支柱(不用說,他太重要了),Popovich就需要證明自己,一樣能把馬刺帶到季後賽. 

少了鄧肯也可以,

有一個 David Robinson 就可以進季後賽了.

這句話有點怪

 POP 教練是有單獨帶過Robinson  但是那年"沒有"進季後賽,97年

 換句話說 在沒有TD之下  POP還沒有進過季後賽

 所以這"有一個 David Robinson 就可以進季後賽了."一定這是你的推論，沒有歷史的證據，而且現在西區競爭激烈，不若當年的情形，你的推論的確有待商榷 

 

不怪, 而是你舉這個球季反而沒看清楚他這季只打了六場,
所以 spurs 直接從季後賽常客變成簽王拿 Duncan 這種爛到谷底的程度,
事實是, Robinson 在 nba 也就那一年所在球隊沒打入季後賽,
而且他一進球隊就創造球隊歷史,
The Spurs had spent the second half of the 1980s as an also-ran, bottoming out in 1988–89 with a 21-61 record,[9] the worst in franchise history at the time. While it was widely thought that the Spurs would become respectable again once Robinson arrived, no one expected what happened in his rookie season. Robinson led the Spurs to the greatest single season turnaround in NBA history at the time[10] (a record the Spurs themselves broke in 1997-98, after drafting Tim Duncan, which was then broken by the Boston Celtics in the 2007–08 NBA season). The Spurs leaped to a record of 56–26 for a remarkable 35 game improvement. They advanced to the second round of the Western Conference playoffs where they lost in seven games to the eventual conference champion Portland Trail Blazers. Following the 1989–90 season, he was unanimously named the NBA rookie of the year, and subsequently Sega produced a game featuring him entitled David Robinson's Supreme Court.

根據歷史, 要真的夠爛的教練, 才能有 Robinson 都進不了季後賽.