在PTT活塞版曾經與版眾有些熱烈討論,似乎沒有一個結果
雖然這種情況已經不會發生,但還是想弄清楚....
假設今年活塞跟湖人的戰績都57-25(活塞已取得59勝,不可能發生了)
兩隊例行賽1:1,在總冠軍賽假如相遇,主場優勢屬誰?
假設今年 總戰績 對東區戰績 對西區戰績
活塞 57-25 36-16 0.692 21-9 0.700
湖人 57-25 20-10 0.667 37-15 0.712
在這裡
http://www.nba.com/statistics/playoff_picture.html
是這麼解釋的
a. Two Teams Tied
(1) Better winning percentage in games against each other.
(2) Better winning percentage against teams in own division (only if tied
teams are in same division).
(3) Better winning percentage against teams in own conference.
(4) Better winning percentage against teams eligible for playoffs in own
conference (including teams that finished the regular season tied for a
playoff position).
(5) Better winning percentage against teams eligible for playoffs in opposite
conference (including teams that finished the regular season tied for a
playoff position).
(6) Better net result of total points scored less total points allowed
against all opponents (“point differential”).
其中第(3)條指出是對自己分區的勝率...也就是湖人擁有主場優勢(37-15:36-16)
但01年的湖人與七六人情況也是例行賽戰績平手,彼此對戰也1:1的情況
2001年 總戰績 對東區戰績 對西區戰績
湖人 56-26 22-8 0.733 34-18 0.654
七六人 56-26 40-14 0.741 16-12 0.571
結果是湖人取得了主場優勢(照上面的解釋是七六人擁有主場優勢,因為
七六人對東區40-14遠勝湖人對西區34-18)
引用的規則如下
http://www.nba.com/playoffs2001/news/home_court_010522.html?nav=ArticleList
Lakers vs. Sixers
These teams had identical regular-season records and they split their
two-game series. The Lakers would have home-court advantage by virtue of
having a better record against the Eastern Conference (22-8, .733) than the
Sixers had against the Western Conference (16-12, .571).
我的判斷是第一個引用的規則是用來排分區種子序的,如果不同區還適用嗎?
但也有眾多版友認為可能是01年到現在的規則可能改了,變成對同區的戰績
(但正常情況之下這對近幾年西區出線隊伍比較不公平,因為近年來西區較強,西區隊伍
對己區戰績可能會較差 對東區可能會比較好,東區則反之..但今年活塞是一種少數例外)
但是這條規則真的有改嗎?有些外電也在活塞獲得57勝時認為活塞對湖人尚未獲得主場優勢,
但今年外電在解釋西區2-6名的排序似乎也出了不少錯...
把01年的狀況告知外電記者,不知道記者們如何解說?
有高手能解惑嗎?